|
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 11:30 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Michel`
|
Post subject: [ Bans ] In A Channel  Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:00 am |
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:50 am Posts: 3
|
|
As We know that the ban list can contain maximum 300 bans and the ignore list maximum 45 ignores , wich is hard for the channels that they have a large number of abuse in it to stop these abuses , i think that increasing the bans/ignores number is a great idea , for example 900 ban instead of 300 and 300 ignore instead of 45 ...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
xplora
|
Post subject:  Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:57 am |
| Senior Cservice Admin |
 |
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:47 am Posts: 564 Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
|
|
erm what network are you on? On undernet the channel banlist limit is 45, and there is no channel ignore list, there is your personal /silence list which has a limit of 15, not 45. The 300 figure you are refering to refer's to X's banlist which is a seperate balist and Requires registering the channel to get.
If you really believe you need more than this, I suggest you get a person bot to manage the channel bans. Either way, remember, Undernet has no channel ignore list, personal /silence is 15, Channel bans is 45, and X (with registration) bans is 300.
_________________ xplora @ undernet.org Past Co-ordinator Undernet Channel Services Committee
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Michel`
|
Post subject: Clearer  Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:12 am |
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:50 am Posts: 3
|
|
channel ignore list , i mean bans by mode , and they are 45 max
the 300 bans that i was talkin about are the bans through x , and i guess this number should be increased so for example we don't get channel ban list is full when we have 300 ban , maybe it can be 900 instead ..
|
|
|
|
 |
|
windox
|
Post subject:  Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:32 am |
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:31 am Posts: 9
|
|
agree
_________________ Excessive use of alcohol can lead to a pregnancy
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Theft
|
Post subject:  Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:13 pm |
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:38 pm Posts: 43 Location: Istanbul, Turkey
|
|
Yeah,I agree with that idea,because it's problem for the big channels which has too many users.But if the bans trough X set 900,it can be too high.According to me,it should be 500 instead of 300 and manuel bans can set 100.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|